![]() ![]() This cannot be shown for the years 2013//15, which constitutes a financing gap. ![]() The case study shows that the increase in net worth and private spending of John and Gayle Fawn can be accounted for by undisclosed savings fromprevious employment income of John Fawn and by reported income for the year 2012/2013. In case the net worth and personal expenditure exceed the reported income and cannot be accounted for by previous savings, indirect evidence is provided that the defendants must have obtained unreported income. ![]() The UK Crown Prosecution Serviceaccuses the defendants of having committed offences against the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002in the period 2012/13-2014/15.Under the net worth method, the assets less liabilities (net worth) and the personal expenditure of the defendants are compared to their reported income during the period of investigation. The present article deals with the application of the net worth method in the financial crime case study of John and Gayle Fawn. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |